TagHarley Quinn

What’s So Bad About Suicide Squad, Then?

This is a question I get asked a lot. I am vocal about my dislike of Adam Glass’ take on the Suicide Squad and on Harley Quinn in particular. My reason is, largely, one of continuity. You see, the Harley Quinn in Suicide Squad is unrecognisable as the Harley Quinn of DC’s history. There’s been a relaunch with the new 52, yes and that’s a valid argument. My counter-argument is that Harley’s changes seem far more substantive to the nature of the character than most other characters’ have been. Whilst there have been fundamental changes to the character we can sum it all up with costume changes.

Superman Side By Side

Superman’s red trunks are gone, there’s more definition to his suit but over all, he’s Superman. No question about it.

Batman Side By Side

Batman is Batman.

Wonder Woman Side By Side

Wonder Woman’s a tricky one, having gone through a last-minute costume revision just before the relaunch but she’s still Wonder Woman. A little silver in place of bronze, back to trunks instead of pants… she’s Wonder Woman. If anything, more iconic after the relaunch as her ‘new 52’ look is closer to the classic than her Odyssey style.

Though not pictured, Green Lantern, Aquaman, Catwoman, Poison Ivy, Black Canary and many others are still recognisably true to themselves with tweaks rather than changes made to their looks.

Harley Quinn Side By Side

Harley is… gone. The argument used by DC is she’s been brought more in line with the book’s tone and Rocksteady’s look for Harley in the Arkham Noun games. I have the Arkham City figure stood infront of me as I write this and I see a blonde haired, flesh-tone skinned girl in a black and red diamond-patterned outfit. It’s not her classic look but it’s closer than the abomination we see monthly in Suicide Squad. That said, if it’s to bring it in line with the book’s tone… I’ll buy it. You see, the tone of Suicide Squad is ‘confused mess without any sense of continuity’.

Can I back that up? Read on…
Continue reading

Give Us Back Our Harley

“The thought was, let’s see her operate outside of the Joker, not being obsessed 24/7,”
Adam Glass, Writer of Suicide Squad 2011, TV Guide Interview

This is a fantastic idea. It was a fantastic idea in Gotham City Sirens, the recently ended serial telling the story of Harley, Selina and Pamela trying to rub along together as friends. It was a fantastic idea in Harley & Ivy, the serial that saw the eponymous duo getting into misadventures. It was a good idea in Harley Quinn when she worked with Harvey Dent, in Secret Six… a good idea but not an original one. Adam’s bold statement of the thought behind the Suicide Squad rendition of Harley Quinn just belies a woeful lack of understanding of who Harley is and her history in the DC universe.

“She’s still funny, she’s still sexy, she’s still a little crazy. This is Harley if she’s moved away from home, her chance to shine on her own.”
Adam Glass, Writer of Suicide Squad 2011, TV Guide Interview

To take your points in order, Adam.

1) No, she isn’t. Humour is a subjective thing, admittedly, but Harley is not what she was. She should be a jester, who fell for the Joker because he made everything funny. It was all for laughs. It put a smile on her face. Harley is a ray of sunshine. Psychotically deranged sunshine. I haven’t seen any evidence of this in the new 52.

2) Harley’s sexiness did not come from her wardrobe, ever. Even when she got out of her iconic costume in Gotham City Sirens and dressed casually the appeal didn’t come from her wardrobe. Harley’s outfit in the first two issues of Suicide Squad was not sexy. There was nothing alluring about it, it was just sexual which is a different thing entirely.

3) Maybe she is still a little crazy. Actually, if she’s calling anyone but Mistah J “puddin'” then she’s clearly lost her mind completely. What she isn’t, though, is skating on the edge of madness, laughing at the absurdity of it all as she goes.

In short, the character presented in Suicide Squad is unrecognisable. Not least because Harley Quinn isn’t clown white, she wears clown white. Whilst I have no problem at all with her pursuing other romantic interests, I do have an issue with her calling Deadshot “puddin'”. Mr J is puddin’. Ivy is ‘Red’. Selina is ‘Kitty’. Harley nicknames the people precious to her. Are we supposed to think she’s gone so far past the boundries of sanity that she thinks Deadshot IS Joker?

It would seem that the team behind the book know what’s up here, too. The sudden and inexplicable (not to mention unexplained and unremarked) costume change between books 2 and 3 is a clear sign of retreat and acknowledgement that mistakes were made. Keep acknowledging it, guys. One of the most unique, delightful and charming villains of the DC universe’s fate hangs in the balance. Give us Harley Quinn, the real Harley Quinn. Trust me, we’ll all be better off.

“Ha! And here you thought I was just another bubble-headed blonde bimbo. Well, the jokes on you! I’m not even a real blonde!”
– Harley Quinn, Harlequinade

No, Harles, sorry, you’re not… for some reason you’re a half-black haired, half-red haired caricature of yourself. But hang in there. Writers come and go but great characters are forever. I hope.

In Defence Of Catwoman

So the DC relaunch is three weeks in and there’s been a lot of good comics coming out. I have, however, seen more than a little criticism of one of my favourite women in DC, Selina Kyle. The criticism seems centered around the beginning and the end of that book. In the beginning we see Selina hastily dressing to flee her apartment. The last page is a full page art piece of Batman and Catwoman engaged in fore-play1.

I’m sorry to say it, folks but if you don’t want a woman who is overtly sexual and sexualized you probably shouldn’t be reading Catwoman. Firstly she is cat-suited in an inherently fetishistic outfit. Disregarding the golden and silver ages, you understand. Secondly she uses a whip as a weapon, which according to perhaps the most broadly used origin story she learnt to use during her prostitution and professional domination days. An origin story I strongly suspect is still canon in the relaunch due to some of the flashback art. She also uses seduction as a weapon, against good and bad guys alike. She’s never been above flirting with the police, Nightwing or Batman to get out of trouble any more than she has been against flirting with Two Face, the Falcones, Ivy, Harley or anyone’s goons to get into trouble. She also has sex with Batman, as shocking as it seems to be for some critics of Catwoman #1. None of this was new, nor did I think it was badly handled in Catwoman #1.

What really bothers me about the criticism is that it is focussed on the first 2 pages and the last page. Almost no one references the 15 or 16 other pages of this book. If they did they’d see things like:

Catwoman passing the Bechdel test. For those who are not in the know, the Bechdel test (traditionally applied to movies) “is a simple test which names the following three criteria: (1) it has to have at least two women in it, who (2) who talk to each other, about (3) something besides a man.” Catwoman passes! In fact the scene above is an extract from a two and a half page conversation. That’s a long time in a book like Catwoman to take out of the action budget. I sincerely hope Lola is a recurring character, she’s already endeared herself to me.

We also see Catwoman posing as the Bartender at a Russian mob party full of escorts. This marks perhaps the first time I can think of when a character in a comic book or comic-book based film, presented with a party full of escorts decided to disguise herself as something other than one of the escorts. It also introduces us to the idea that Catwoman is poly-lingual and eaves-dropping on the Russians’ native-tongued conversations.

We get a hint of her traumatic past in flashback.

Oh and we get a reminder that Catwoman is not a good guy. Even if the victim of her brutal violence totally had it coming, even if the book sets that up with a bright shiny light, this beating is savage, brutal, bloody and drawn out. It’s also interesting to me that it’s very much not why she was there. This is a flash of violence. This is Catwoman seeing red. Are we in for a Selina with a dangerous temper? Personally I hope so, it’s a twist on her character I like.

But above all I want to talk about shoes. Over the years we’ve seen some overt sexualization of Catwoman, as I mentioned. That being the case let’s take a moment to appreciate that even if she is having sex with Batman and even if we do see a fair bit of her red lacy bra in the opening scene we are still looking at the most practically dressed Catwoman ever.

There’s a distressing tendancy to put Catwoman in the high heels of her dominatrix past, of the sexualised stereotype. Look at the movies, for example. Even Dark Knight Rises has released stills of Hathaway in high-heels along with her catsuit. I thought the driving motivation of the Nolan movies was a believable Dark Knight, something grounded in reality. Why, then, is the master cat-burglar running around on the least stable platform humanity has devised as an every-day shoe?

What does Catwoman wear post relaunch?

If the only aim of Catwoman today was to sexualise her and turn her into nothing but a sex symbol why does she speak Russian? Why is she still a thief? Why does she have a temper that will force her off-task to beat a man to within an inch of his life because he wronged her in the past?

And why is she in good, practical, grippy boots?

N.B. I’m not going to be writing an in-defence of Starfire. The relaunch of her character has been horrific. I’m not going to be writing an in-defence of Harley Quinn’s new costume. It’s a travesty that kills her character. I’m not going to be writing an in-defence of Karen Starr being reduced from Power Girl to bit part in Mister Terrific.

In no way am I saying there haven’t been mistakes in the DC re-launch. I’m just saying give Catwoman a break. She’s a bad girl, so it’s very easy to judge her, but give her a chance to shine.

1 I’ve actually seen at least one commenter describe this page as depicting Batman penetrating Catwoman, which if you look at the art work is a physical impossibility and belies the bias of the comment as far as I’m concerned.

© 2017 wryterra.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑