TagGames

CS:GO – The Problem, In a Nutshell

Since its’ release, I’ve been playing an awful lot of CS:GO, the latest remake of Counter Strike. I have history with the original source material. I was part of the first ever public-server game of Counter Strike way back in the day and I’ve been playing, on and off, ever since.

I’m not very good. That’s not the point.

Anyway, that confession out of the way, let’s move on. There’s a lot to say about GO, some of which I’ll doubtless say in a fuller review in time. There’s no silencers any more. There are molotovs now. Weapons feel floaty but it’s all very pretty. I especially like the way the teams are defined with a uniform look and feel but a randomness that marks each player as individual. Something I was pushing for when I used to work on the occasional mod back in the days of Quake 3 and Elite Force.

The problem though is the AWP. The problem that has plagued CS throughout living memory. In the picture above we see five members of a team of eight players hiding in the same spot with the same sniper rifle. That’s five of the surviving six members of the team. Who are not doing their job. Who are camping, for kill count.

CS:GO is already plagued with pistol/sniper scripts. To prevent abuse of the AWP’s one-hit kill power, the developers took out the target reticle (the little + in the center of the screen) when carrying a sniper rifle but not being zoomed in. To combat this certain players wrote a script that automatically switches from pistol to rifle, fires a shot and switches back. In other words they’re aiming with the reticle as normal but firing a one-hit kill sniper rifle.

I’ve said it before, Counter Strike would be a vastly improved game if the developers put a limit on the number of AWPs purchasable by any one team and put a delay on switching to the weapon before firing. Perhaps a little animation of the player removing the lens caps from the AWP’s scope, just a half-second delay to prevent pistol scripts.

Until such time, however, remember to throw a molotov up into the sniper’s nest.

Mass Effect In Retrospect

Before I begin I want to put this post in context. I finished Mass Effect 3 when it came out 3 weeks ago (at the start of writing, longer by the end!). I am part way through my second play through, beginning to explore the possibilities available in the narrative. I operate under the assumption that Mass Effect 3’s ending is a trilogy and series ending finale, that further games may be set in the universe but are not part of this particular narrative because this is what we have been told. April has not yet come, when BioWare have told us they will address the ending. That’s where I’m writing from, a position of necessarily incomplete knowledge. No doubt I’ll have more thoughts and perhaps more to say when we hear from BioWare.

Also, before I begin, I want to state my position up front and clearly. I do not like the ending of Mass Effect 3. I do not think it is suitable to, good enough for or in keeping with the Mass Effect franchise. I am not demanding a new ending, do not consider myself as part of any movement, I am merely a disappointed fan. The reason I care that I do not like the ending is that I consider Mass Effect to be one of the most important science fiction franchises in recent years whose importance and significance is squandered by this non-sensical ending.

Why? Read on, but expect spoilers. For the whole franchise.

Continue reading

© 2017 wryterra.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑